AN STUDY & RESEARCH WORK BY BANGLADESHI MARINERS IN COLLABORATION WITH FOREIGN RESEARCHERS.
10 SEPT 2020
An oil tanker is a ship designed for the bulk transport of oil or its products. Even though many safety measures are being practiced on board, oil tankers are known to encounter the most risk of being involved in a disaster. Maritime accidents can be caused by various factors including perils of the sea, nature of cargo, and human error. However, the main factor that induces the present situation is the human factor. T he purpose of this research was to identify the human factors that contribute to oil tanker accidents, to identify the most prominent root cause of human factors, and to propose a suggestion for minimizing the risk of human factors that lead to oil tanker accidents. For this purpose, the data was collected through a questionnaire that focused on the causes of human factors that contribute to oil tanker accidents. The questionnaire was distributed to the targeted respondents, who were experts of the maritime industry, captains, deck officers, and deck cadets sailing onboard an oil tanker; the collected data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to achieve the objective of this study. The result of the research was as expected, where occupational fatigue was identified as the most prominent root cause. With the result of this research, a suggestion can be proposed to minimize the risk of human factors resulting in oil tanker accidents, thus, the number of oil tanker accidents can be greatly reduced, and the aftermaths can be hindered.
This commonly acknowledged that a ship’s safe operation is not absolute since the risk of mishaps is consistently present
(Gasparotti, 2010). The primary issue that oil tankers connote is the hazards that it might cause due to the cargo that is
being transported. It is one of the most dangerous types of transportati on; the aftermath may be destructive, or even fatal
(Uğurlu, 2012). In the course of the most recent decade, international maritime authorities have made noteworthy
endeavors to promote safety at sea in the maritime industry (O’Neil, 2003). Even though numerous steps have been taken,
there are still a huge nu mber of maritime accidents occurring worldwide to date. As stated by the Maritime Safety Authority
of New Zealand (1996), human errors, technical and mechanical failures, and environmental factors are commonly
underlined factors that contribute to maritime accidents. Maritime accidents may result in environmental damage,
material damage, or even loss of human lives. Hence, the prevention of maritime accidents is still a focal matter of
maritime interests (Celik, 2010).
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) accepts marine accidents as a reference in the process of establishing rules
and amendments to ensure maritime safety. Various international conventions deal with maritime safety, and one of
the most significant is the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, which is also known as SOLAS. SOLAS
covers a wide scope of measures intended to improve the safety of shipping. SOLAS is one of the oldest conventions;
the first version was adopted in 1914 after the sinking of the Titanic with the loss of more than 1500 lives (IMO 2004).
Besides Titanic, there are also other significant marine accidents with solid consequences such as the Torrey Canyon,
Amoco Cadiz, Exxon Valdez, Independa, Prestige, Erika, and Hebei Spirit. These accidents have driven the effort to take
international level precautions. Therefore, it is crystal clear that lessons learned from past marine accidents have formed a
basis for the conventions and contracts established for the prevention of maritime accidents. Due to the significance of
these accidents and the potential human contribution that resulted in the mishap, this research aims to identify the
human factors that contribute to maritime accidents involving oil tankers, to identify the most prominent root cause of human factors, and to propose a suggestion for minimizing the risk of human factors that lead to oil tanker accidents.
Ship operation involves a great number of risks: social, to the property, to the environment, and could tarnish the company’s
image. At the point when an oil tanker leaves a safety route, it incurs a set of risks associated with collision and grounding
events that have the potential to cause a great disaster. Maritime accidents can be caused by various factors including
perils of the sea, nature of cargo, and human error. However, the main factor that induces the present situation is the human
factor; human factors contribute to more maritime accidents than any other single factor. Numerous researches have been
done and various measures have been implemented to inhibit human factors that contribute to maritime accidents involving
oil tankers. However, the root cause has not been identified and thus the r isk of human factors that contribute to oil tanker
accidents could not be hindered. Therefore, the human factors that contribute to maritime accidents involving oil tankers, and the most prominent root cause of human factors should be identified so that a suggestion for minimizing the risk of human factors can be proposed to greatly reduce the number of oil tanker accidents.
This research has three objectives. Firstly, to identify the human factors that contribute to maritime acciden ts involving
oil tankers. Secondly, to identify the most prominent root cause of human factors that contribute to maritime accidents
involving oil tankers. Thirdly, to propose suggestions for minimizing the risk of human factors that lead to maritime
accid ents involving oil tankers.
4.1 Background of Oil Tanker
An oil tanker is a ship designed for the bulk transport of oil or its products. It is also known as a petroleum tanker. There are
two basic types of oil tankers, which are crud e tankers and product tankers. Crude tankers are ships intended to move
massive quantities of unrefined crude oil from its point of extraction to refineries (Donaldson L., 1994). Meanwhile,
product tankers are commonly much smaller in size and designed to move refined products from refineries to points
near consuming markets. Oil tankers are generally classified by their size and in addition to their occupation. The size
classes range from inland or coastal tankers with deadweight (DWT) which is normally of a few thousand metric tons, to the
gigantic Ultra Large Crude Carriers (ULCCs) of 550,000 DWT.
According to Thomas Barnes (2018), tankers move approximately 2,000,000,000 metric tons of oil every year.
4.2 Maritime Accidents and Risks
As in conceptual definition, an accident is defined as an unpleasant event, especially in a vehicle, that happens
unexpectedly or is not planned, and causes injury or damage instead of something that happens expectedly (Oxford
Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, 2006). According to Stephenson (1991), an accident can be defined as an
undesirable event that results in damage to humans, assets, or the environment. In general, an accident is an unplanned,
unexpected, and undersigned event that occurs suddenly and may result in injury, loss, a decrease in value of resources, or
an increase in liabilities. According to Piret (2008), a maritime accident is defined as an event that results in loss of life or
extensive pollution, collision, fire, explosion, grounding, damages of the underwa ter hull of the ship that may cause
flooding of one or more sections of the ship, and the total loss of the ship. Besides, risk can be defined as an evaluation of
hazards in terms of severity and probability (Stephenson,1991).
4.3 Maritime Accident Investigation
Accident investigations are typically conducted by or for government agencies, using largely legal logic that relies on
the preponderance of evidence to determine the role of different factors in an accident’s cause or causes, rather than
on statistical inference as in empirical research . The logic used in investigations is counterfactual, where investigators
strive to determine whether an accident would have occurred in the absence of specified events and whether the events
would have occurred in the absence of specific errors and/or system malfunctions .To determine if a mariner’s error led
to an accident, investigators must have sufficient evidence to allow a determination that without that error the accident would not have occurred. App lying the logic of accident investigations to determine the role of fatigue requires making
three separate but related determinations to establish that a mariner was 1) fatigued 2) committed an error that is
consistent with the research on cognitive performance degradations from fatigue, and 3) that no reasonable alternative can be found to fatigue to adequately explain the cause of the error. Therefore, to investigate the role that fatigue may have played in an accident, investigators need to establish fir st that the mariner was fatigued at the time.
Research on fatigue causation cites essentially four medical causes of fatigue, insufficient sleep in the hours immediately
preceding an event, which leads to acute fatigue, sleep loss in the days or nights pre ceding the accident, which leads to
chronic fatigue, extended time awake on the task that leads to fatigue from the effects of the extended wakefulness and the
demands of the task over time, and shift work or rapid time zone change that leads to circadian sleep disruption.
4.4 Factors of Maritime Accidents
Maritime accidents may be caused by various factors. According to Clifford, C.B, and Ah, K.S. (2004), 50% of maritime accidents are caused by human factors, while another 30% of maritime accidents occur due to the failure of humans to avoid an accident; 30% of maritime accidents are results of inadequate conditions encountered by humans.
There is a combination of characteristics in the maritime industry that could contribute to a huge number of accidents:
fatigue, stress, work pressure, communication, environmental factors, and long periods away from home. According to
Safahani, M. (2015). Furthermore, human factor may be defined as the scientific study of the man machine interaction
regarding human abilit ies and limitations concerning the design of systems (Akaahmia, 2014), 49% of maritime accidents are caused by human factors, while only 35% are contributed by technical factors, and 16% contributed by environmental factors respectively (Catherine, H., 200 6).
According to the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (2006), an error is defined as a mistake, especially one that causes problems or affects the results of something. Furthermore, the UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB, 2000) has stated th at human error is still the dominant factor that causes most maritime accidents. O’Neil (2003) also stated that the “human element” was often termed in the shipping literature. Hence, human error is an individual’s mistake that may cause a problem or resul t in an accident.
There are there primary and secondary data collected to complete this research. However, this research is quantitative research that needs to obtain data from primary and secondary data. One of the methods to get primary d ata is through a questionnaire. A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a series of questions to gather information from respondents. The researcher had done a questionnaire because it was cheaper and requires less effort as compared to other types of surveys, such as verbal or telephone surveys. Besides, questionnaires usually have standardized answers that make it simple and easier to compile the data obtained. The questionnaires are based on the objectives of the study to find the experience with the current sailor on board ship. All the answers in question are based on personal experience and knowledge about the questions being asked. In this research, the researcher had distributed the questionnaire through the internet or online as a Google Form. The questionnaire consisted of various questions that were constructed based on factors, sub factors, and then finally narrowed down to the focused matter. The primary focus was concentrated on identifying the causes of human factors that contribute to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 15 questions, which uses a 5 points Likert-type scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The questionnaire was distributed to the targeted respondents, who were experts of the maritime industry, captains, deck officers, and deck cadets sailing onboard an oil tanker terminal operator. For this research, the researcher had used a series of questions in the form of a questionnaire as the instrument to obtain data. The questionnaire consisted of various questions that focus on the causes of human factors that contribute to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. Data analysis is the process of evaluating data using analytical and statistical tools to discover useful information and aid in decision making. The interview questions were addressed to the targeted respondents, who were experts of the maritime industry, captains, deck officers, and deck cadets sailing onboard an oil tanker as they have t he most experience and knowledge regarding this issue. The questionnaire was used to gain information and knowledge on the causes of human factors that contribute to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. The constructed questions consisted of various c auses of human factors, which include the limitations of human senses, perception and cognition, occupational fatigue, mental
workload, the intoxication of a vessel’s operator, communication barriers, working environment, and man machine interface on vessels. This would be very useful for the researcher to identify the primary cause of human factor that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers.
Data analysis is the process of evaluating data using analytical and statistical tools to discover useful information and aid in
decision making. In this study, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) method was used to analyze the data that was obtained. Quantitative and comprehensive data was analyzed and arranged in table forms and charts to display the
percentage of each factor based on the data collection. Hence, the most prominent root cause of human factor that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers could be identified.
Based on the data obtained, there were various causes of human factors: Human senses, perception, and cognition, behavior, fatigue, mental workload, the intoxication of vessel’s operator, communication, teamwork, work environment,
human machine interaction, specific issues in the design of maritime equipment, and crew response to technology.
Firstly, human senses include an individual’s vision, hearing, tactile senses, and vestibular senses; perception and cognition
comprise of attention, situation awareness, decision making, memory, and knowl edge. Furthermore, behavior encompasses
skill based behavior, rule based behavior, knowledge based behavior, automated behavior, and risk taking behavior.
Moreover, occupational fatigue involves prolonged working hours, heavy workload, and fatigue during w atch keeping , shift work, night work, simultaneous tasks, and distractions. Besides, mental workload consists of illness, pressure, concerns, stress, anxiety, and depression. Besides, the intoxication of the vessel’s operator covers the consumption of drugs and alcohol, meanwhile, communication incorporates the usage of the local language or mother tongue, and poor mastery of Maritime English. Also, teamwork encompasses authority gradient, leadership styles, social rule, and power.
Additionally, the work environment includes noise, vibration, lighting, climatic conditions, ship motions, accommodation, and social factors. Next, Human Machine Interaction on vessels comprises of automation issues, lack of equipment
standardization, and lack of equipment usabili ty. Finally, specific issues in the design and integration of maritime equipment comprise visual warnings, controls and displays, and audible warnings such as alarms. Fatigue recorded a majority of 43.9%, followed by communication with 9.6%, mental workloa d with 9.1%, human machine interaction with 8.6%, crew response to technology with 8.0%, human senses with 4.8%, specific issues in the design of maritime equipment with 4.8%, perception and cognition with 3.2%, followed by behavior, the intoxication of vessel’s operator, and work environment with 2.1% respectively, and finally teamwork with 1.6%.
Table 1 Causes of Human Factor
Based on Table 1, the frequency of each cause of the human factor was measured out of a total of 187 responses. These
responses strongly agreed that the respective cause of human factors is the root factor that contributes the most to oil tanker
accidents. Accordingly, 82 responses strongly agreed that fatigue is the root cause of human factor that contributes to
maritime accidents involving oil tankers, followed by 18 responses for communication, 17 responses for mental workload, 16 responses for Human Machine Interaction, 15 responses for crew response to technology, 9 responses for human senses, 9 responses for specific issues in the design of maritime equipment, 6 responses for perception and cognition, 4 responses for behavior, 4 responses for intoxication of vessel’s operator, 4 responses for the work environment, and finally 3 responses for teamwork.
Based on Figure 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, and 13, the frequency of each cause of human factor was measured out of a total of 108 responses. These responses strongly agreed that the respective cause of human factors is the root factor that contributes the most to oil tanker accidents. First and foremost, 104 respondents agreed while 4 respondents disagreed that the human factor is the primary cause of oil tanker accidents. Accordingly, 2 respondents strongly disagreed, 11 respondents disagreed, 24 respondents were neutral, 62 respondents agreed, and 9 respondents strongl y agreed that human senses are the root cause that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. Furthermore, 6 respondents strongly disagreed, 22 respondents disagreed, 60 respondents were neutral, 14 respondents agreed, and 6 respondents stron gly agreed that perception and cognition are the root cause that contributes to oil tanker accidents.
Moreover, 55 respondents strongly disagreed, 25 respondents, disagreed, 9 respondents were neutral, 15 respondents agreed, and 4 respondents strongly agre ed that behavior is the root cause that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. Besides, 3 respondents strongly disagreed, 1 respondent disagreed, 3 respondents were neutral, 19 respondents agreed, and 82 respondents strongly agreed that fatigue is the root cause that contributes to oil tanker accidents. Besides, 3 respondents strongly disagreed, 3 respondents disagreed, 11 respondents were neutral, 74 respondents agreed, and 17 respondents strongly agreed that mental workload is the root cause that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. Also, 53 respondents strongly disagreed, 31 respondents disagreed, 6 respondents were neutral, 14 respondents agreed, and 4 respondents strongly agreed that intoxication of the vessel’s operator is the root cause that contributes to oil tanker accidents. Next, 3 respondents strongly disagreed, 19 respondents, disagreed, 23 respondents were neutral, 45 respondents agreed, and 18 respondents strongly agreed that communication is the root cause that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. Furthermore, 27 respondents strongly disagreed, 54 respondents disagreed, 13 respondents were neutral, 11 respondents agreed, and 3 respondents strongly agreed that teamwork is the root cause t hat contributes to oil tanker accidents. Moreover, 25 respondents strongly disagreed, 54 respondents, disagreed, 18 respondents were neutral, 7 respondents agreed, and 4 respondents strongly agreed that the work environment is the root cause that contribut es to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. Besides, 2 respondents strongly disagreed, 10 respondents disagreed, 38 respondents were neutral, 42 respondents agreed, and 16 respondents strongly agreed that human machine interaction is the root cause that contributes to oil tanker accidents. Besides, 30 respondents strongly disagreed, 39 respondents disagreed, 15 respondents were neutral, 15 respondents agreed, and 9 respondents strongly agreed that specific issues in the design and integration of maritime equipment are the root cause that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. Finally, 18 respondents strongly disagreed, 10 respondents, disagreed, 19 respondents were neutral, 46 respondents agreed, and 15 respondents strongly agreed that crew responses to technology are the root cause that contributes to oil tanker accidents.
Fatigue is the most prominent root cause that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers, thus, strategic
measures must be taken to hinder its consequences. Firstly, seafarers must be aware of how sleep deficit affects their daily
performance, and they should avoid accepting a watch while undergoing fatigue since they may be unfit for the duty. In such
cases, the crew should request another qualified watch keeping officer to take charge if possible, but if this is not
possible then the crew should inform the Master and refuse duty until they are well rested and able to conduct a watch safely. This is because the vessel’s safety together with its crew should be the utmost priority. Furthermore, seafarers should consult with a qualified medical professional before consuming any medication as certain medications might cause sleepiness or dizziness and disqualify a crew from performing the watch. Besides, bridge resource management plays a vital
role in the safe operation of an oil tanker; all crew on board must have adequate knowledge to utilize all available
resources while facing a hazard with limited reaction time to ensure safe operation of the vessel. Finally, seafarers should
always try to avoid distractions while conducting a watch, even though if it is necessary to communicate with crew members
and perform other tasks simultaneously. Multi tasking may not be avoided but utmost priority should always be given to the
safe operation of the vessel. Therefore, these measures may help to reduce the risk of fatigue as the root cause of the
human factor to greatly reduce the number of maritime accidents involving oil tankers.
The purpose of the study was to identify the human factors that contribute to oil tanker accidents, to identify the most
prominent root cause of human factors, and to propose a suggestion for minimizing the risk of human factors that lead to
maritime accidents involving oil tankers. This study was very important to increase awareness and inhibit the risk of human
factors that contribute to oil tanker accidents. Based on the results obtained from this research, fatigue is the most
prominent cause of human f actor that contributes to maritime accidents involving oil tankers. The significance of these
results advocates suggestions or recommendations to greatly reduce the number of oil tanker accidents soon. This research
may again provide basic knowledge for developing preventive measures that may avoid the aftermath of an oil tanker
accident in the future.
 .Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27
40. DOI: 10.3316/qrj0902027
 .Can non, H., & Magnuson, W. (1978). An Analysis of oil tanker casualties 1969 1974. Washington: U.S. G.P.O.
 .Eliopoulou, E., & Papanikolaou, A. (2007). Casualty analysis of large tankers. Journal Of Marine Science And
Technology, 12(4), 240 250. DOI: 10.1007/s 00773 0070255 8
 .Goodwin, L., & Goodwin, W. (1984). Qualitative Vs.Quantitative Research or Qualitative and Quantitative
Research?. Nursing Research, 33(6), 378 384. DOI:10.1097/00006199 198411000 00022
 .Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015 ). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal Of Applied
Science & Technology, 7(4), 396 403. DOI:10.9734/bjast/2015/14975
 .Martins, M., & Maturana, M. (2010). Human Error Contribution in Collision and Grounding of Oil Tankers.
Transport, 22(4). DOI: 10.2478/v10174 010 0026 x
 .Ohtsubo, H., Kawamoto, Y., & Kuroiwa, T. (1994). Experimental and numerical research on ship collision and
grounding of oil tankers. Nuclear Engineering And Design, 150(2 3), 385 396. DOI: 10.1016/0029 5493(94)90158 9
 .Palinkas, L., Horwitz, S., Green, C., Wisdom, J., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K . (2013). Purposeful Sampling for
Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration And Policy In
Mental Health And Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533 544. DOI: 10.1007/s10488 013 0528 y
 0.Papanikolao u, A., Eliopoulou, E., Alissafaki, A., Mikelis, N., Aksu, S., & Delautre, S. (2007). Casualty analysis of
Aframax tankers. Proceedings Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal Of Engineering For The Maritime Environment, 221(2), 47 60. D OI: 10.1243/14750902jeme74
 Staff, N. (1990). Tanker Spills. Washington: National Academies Press.
 U ğ urlu, Ö., Köse, E., Y ı ld ı r ı m, U., & Yükseky ı ld ı z, E.(2013). Marine accident analysis for collision and
grounding in oil tanker using FTA method. Maritime Policy& Management, 42(2), 163 185. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.856524
 Ung, S. (2018). Human error a ssessment of oil tanker grounding. Safety Science, 104, 16 28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.035
 Strauch, B. (2015). Can we investigate safety culture in accident investigations, or should we? Safety Science, 77,
 Australian Transport Safety Bureau. (2007). Analysis, causality, and proof in safety investigations. (Aviation Research and Analysis Report
Dr. Capt. Mohammed Russtam Suhrab Ismail is a senior lecturer in University Malaysia Terenggan u. His research relies on the safety of navigation and Maritime Education and Training E mail: email@example.com
Ahmad Faizal Ahmad Fuad is a senior lecturer in University Malaysia Terengganu. His research relie s on the safety of maritime operations and maritime waterways. E mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Mohd Hafizi Said is a lecturer in University Malaysia Terengganu. His research relies on maritime risk assessment. E mail: email@example.com
Dheva Rhueben velaudam is currently pursuing a degree program in Nautical Science and Maritime Transportation in University of Malaysia Terengganu, E mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Capt. Tamim Ahmed is currently pursuing a master degree program in Nautical Science and Maritime Transportation in the University of Malaysia Terengganu, E mail: email@example.com